This project benefits the New Russia? (John McClane)
Moscow jake raulerson has refused to restructure the debt of Ukraine Latvia jake raulerson Russian submarine spotted the Western media about the "prisoners of Crimea" and "kingdom of Russian terror" on the peninsula in the Russian army received the first complexes jamming Moscow-1 New Russian Navy frigates
Moscow does not need this project in any part of the Russian Federation (why another subsidized region with a destroyed infrastructure and with so many weapons in their hands?), Or as a buffer zone between Ukraine jake raulerson and Russia (why?). Ukraine in the Russian Federation is not the most profitable acquisition, even without the western regions. Too high a price, too big risks.
Much has been written about the importance of the Russian market for the Ukrainian economy, jake raulerson but the importance of the Ukrainian market for the Russian economy do not have to give up. In my opinion, an early normalization of the situation in the Donbas and in the interests of Moscow and Kiev. I do not have information in its entirety, to give a precise definition of what he wants from Kiev Donbass (autonomy, the status of the Russian language, economic and political freedom from Kiev, full independence or vice versa). Too many new commanders and political leaders from the LC and the DNI, which can make the opposite statement within one week, the war to the bitter end, we are Ukraine, and we want to stay in the Ukrainian economic space and in general, pay pensions, etc. Unity and understanding what to do next at the Donbass not. No order, no planning, no security, even from internal enemies in the persons of crime. In Kiev itself is absolutely a similar situation, and in the face of the same Poroshenko, you can hear absolutely contradictory statements. Perhaps Peter podmahivaet and those who want to ATO to victory and those who want to solve economic problems and the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Donbass. Military confrontation is not profitable and do not need to either Europe or Moscow or Kiev. Beneficiary of this situation many call the United States. The basic purpose - to weaken and press Russia and Europe. These goals are reached. Achieved even more, the relationship between the EU and Russia leave much to be desired. Ukraine, as the initiator of this whole mess they do not care, killer, after "work" normally liquidated.
Therefore, the question arises whether it is time to "turn off" the project Novorossia and begin to negotiate? Often, in order to understand your opponent, you need to put yourself in his place. If we imagine a similar situation in Russia with the breakaway regions, the "soak in the toilet" is not the most aggressive statement. It has long been the moment when it is time to negotiate and what to sacrifice something. Examples of peace agreements, including with Europe, in Russia's history is more than enough. It's time to turn off the emotions.
Tools for implementation - the trilateral meeting in the format of the EU, Russia and Ukraine. jake raulerson I suppose even a tripartite joint patrols of the Ukrainian-Russian border. This is my opinion and view of the situation. jake raulerson Is there any alternative?
In the current format, yes, probably no one needs this project. But if, without the basic support of the Russian Federation, jake raulerson they decide their tasks, the department and to build a state, it will be possible to return to this issue.
... True strategic and tactical objectives they do not know ...
The current existence of the "New Russia" Russia is beneficial in terms of reducing anti-Russian fascists. But the project was born with such loss of life and infrastructure, which of course, would be better if it was not.
*** I study to build a world without taking jake raulerson into account the existence of the Russian Federation in principle. Dung was not enough:-(*** jake raulerson
You still easier to "Muscovites" blame than to admit that they themselves were obosr * and 23 years have not been able to build a "nEzalezhnu dErzhavu." USA through their pawns - your President / Prime pushes you into bezvylazno g * contrib, and somehow to blame Russia. Well, now, boys, themselves, everything themselves, once you enemy of Russia and "occupier". Pay for everything is real and grown-up, you are "Europa". Although all even in the "Europa" it became clear that no freebies - no Hohlostana :)))
3) Russia (since we benefit from a buffer from the Nazis junta) jake raulerson
Source jake raulerson of instability, which could potentially inflate (supplying both sides) until the war throughout Europe. Which can then be saved and have solemnly from the dividends jake raulerson for the next 30-50 years.
Of course, on the question of the physical capacity to fan the flames of war the US can argue, but I guess they think they can do it and therefore consider any sources of instability in Eurasia as profitable currently.
Login or register to post comments
And the man in the street does not understand that tomorrow except martyrs - he will receive the smuggling of weapons and mass cultivation of opium and cannabis mkka within the Square. Than overseas curators will be engaged very actively. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How's that for a turn?
It's one thing when you are at war with the other Stra
Moscow jake raulerson has refused to restructure the debt of Ukraine Latvia jake raulerson Russian submarine spotted the Western media about the "prisoners of Crimea" and "kingdom of Russian terror" on the peninsula in the Russian army received the first complexes jamming Moscow-1 New Russian Navy frigates
Moscow does not need this project in any part of the Russian Federation (why another subsidized region with a destroyed infrastructure and with so many weapons in their hands?), Or as a buffer zone between Ukraine jake raulerson and Russia (why?). Ukraine in the Russian Federation is not the most profitable acquisition, even without the western regions. Too high a price, too big risks.
Much has been written about the importance of the Russian market for the Ukrainian economy, jake raulerson but the importance of the Ukrainian market for the Russian economy do not have to give up. In my opinion, an early normalization of the situation in the Donbas and in the interests of Moscow and Kiev. I do not have information in its entirety, to give a precise definition of what he wants from Kiev Donbass (autonomy, the status of the Russian language, economic and political freedom from Kiev, full independence or vice versa). Too many new commanders and political leaders from the LC and the DNI, which can make the opposite statement within one week, the war to the bitter end, we are Ukraine, and we want to stay in the Ukrainian economic space and in general, pay pensions, etc. Unity and understanding what to do next at the Donbass not. No order, no planning, no security, even from internal enemies in the persons of crime. In Kiev itself is absolutely a similar situation, and in the face of the same Poroshenko, you can hear absolutely contradictory statements. Perhaps Peter podmahivaet and those who want to ATO to victory and those who want to solve economic problems and the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Donbass. Military confrontation is not profitable and do not need to either Europe or Moscow or Kiev. Beneficiary of this situation many call the United States. The basic purpose - to weaken and press Russia and Europe. These goals are reached. Achieved even more, the relationship between the EU and Russia leave much to be desired. Ukraine, as the initiator of this whole mess they do not care, killer, after "work" normally liquidated.
Therefore, the question arises whether it is time to "turn off" the project Novorossia and begin to negotiate? Often, in order to understand your opponent, you need to put yourself in his place. If we imagine a similar situation in Russia with the breakaway regions, the "soak in the toilet" is not the most aggressive statement. It has long been the moment when it is time to negotiate and what to sacrifice something. Examples of peace agreements, including with Europe, in Russia's history is more than enough. It's time to turn off the emotions.
Tools for implementation - the trilateral meeting in the format of the EU, Russia and Ukraine. jake raulerson I suppose even a tripartite joint patrols of the Ukrainian-Russian border. This is my opinion and view of the situation. jake raulerson Is there any alternative?
In the current format, yes, probably no one needs this project. But if, without the basic support of the Russian Federation, jake raulerson they decide their tasks, the department and to build a state, it will be possible to return to this issue.
... True strategic and tactical objectives they do not know ...
The current existence of the "New Russia" Russia is beneficial in terms of reducing anti-Russian fascists. But the project was born with such loss of life and infrastructure, which of course, would be better if it was not.
*** I study to build a world without taking jake raulerson into account the existence of the Russian Federation in principle. Dung was not enough:-(*** jake raulerson
You still easier to "Muscovites" blame than to admit that they themselves were obosr * and 23 years have not been able to build a "nEzalezhnu dErzhavu." USA through their pawns - your President / Prime pushes you into bezvylazno g * contrib, and somehow to blame Russia. Well, now, boys, themselves, everything themselves, once you enemy of Russia and "occupier". Pay for everything is real and grown-up, you are "Europa". Although all even in the "Europa" it became clear that no freebies - no Hohlostana :)))
3) Russia (since we benefit from a buffer from the Nazis junta) jake raulerson
Source jake raulerson of instability, which could potentially inflate (supplying both sides) until the war throughout Europe. Which can then be saved and have solemnly from the dividends jake raulerson for the next 30-50 years.
Of course, on the question of the physical capacity to fan the flames of war the US can argue, but I guess they think they can do it and therefore consider any sources of instability in Eurasia as profitable currently.
Login or register to post comments
And the man in the street does not understand that tomorrow except martyrs - he will receive the smuggling of weapons and mass cultivation of opium and cannabis mkka within the Square. Than overseas curators will be engaged very actively. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ How's that for a turn?
It's one thing when you are at war with the other Stra
No comments:
Post a Comment