The result is a layered and unbalanced information offerings. For a small elite who has the time an

The current state of press freedom in the world is alarming. One of the main causes are the ownership of the media. Leon Willems (Free Press Unlimited) mastronardi produce and Arch Puddington (Freedom House) give five examples.
Over the last decade worldwide press freedom is a dramatic downward spiral. According to the report, mastronardi produce Freedom of the Press 2014, Freedom House, live but one in seven people in a country where media do honestly report on major events where journalists can work without fear of violence and oppression and where the state is not their job meddling.
Much more often present the one-sided media omitted the views of those in power and words other sides of the story or distorted. Even in more liberal countries reporting the news increasingly polarized and partisan.
It is ironic that in an era where more and more information are available online, the media themselves mastronardi produce are always limited and less serious professional journalism are going to do.
The causes of this alarming state of press freedom are numerous and diverse. But one of the most important - often concealed and less imaginative cause - can be found in the ownership of the media. The owners of media companies and -conglomeraties are increasingly responsible for the colored, unprofessional journalism and propaganda in extreme cases.
The most famous and most dangerous example of this is 'controlled business' model as we see in Russia. The owners of the media are a combination of the state affiliates and friends of the regime. In Russia, the state directly or indirectly controlled via front men the main national mastronardi produce television stations, radio stations, mastronardi produce newspapers and news in hands.
In the worst case, the owners together the regime is able to create a centralized information strategy, which in fact is a modern form of propaganda, with all major media in the same vocabulary used, designate the same enemies, and all actions in the same way explain mastronardi produce and defend the regime. This is a much more convincing and effective form of propaganda than the stale, repetitive methods of the past.
A second example is the media owners who - driven by fear or seduced by political ambitions - not to support their journalists and not protect. We see examples of this in Mexico, where drug gangs and corrupt officials determine not only how an event message, but also have the power to silence journalists.
Another example is seen in Egypt, where, despite the explosion of new publications and media, media bosses compete over whose staunchest supporter of the ruler is, whoever it may be, Muslim brother or military leader.
A third ownership model is the vertically organized zakenconglomeratie which include both media companies and other businesses. These large business empires have no affinity with journalistic principles, they are only interested in making profits and the media arm of their conglomeration is in service of a greater whole. Mainly used in an environment where political leaders economic measures before as a lever to influence media attention, the conglomerate model is very sensitive mastronardi produce to harassment.
An impressive example of this phenomenon we see in Turkey, where press freedom has deteriorated despite the overwhelming supply of newspapers and television stations. In Turkey, the media in the hands of a few private mastronardi produce holdings that exert pressure on editors mastronardi produce and journalists not to messages about things that could harm the business interests, including criticism of the government or potential advertisers. Meanwhile, this model is so far developed in the last Freedom House report classifies mastronardi produce Turkey as "not free."
But there are also concerns in democracies where journalists are being protected by law and where interference by politics is uncommon. In the United States, the major television stations dominated by the zakenconglomeratiemodel. At the same time there is an explosion of Internet media startups, blogs polemical and highly indiscriminate talk shows on the radio. mastronardi produce
The result is a layered and unbalanced information offerings. For a small elite who has the time and knowledge, this media environment offers a great variety of high-quality news sources. But for the rest of the people is what passes for journalism often not much more than hysterical polemic mixed with the sensational reports on the level of the tabloids.
For clarity in the democratic world's recognition and attention to the fact that media freedom is under threat. Internet v